How to explain the Microsoft Architecture?
My little explanation of Expeditor has drawn a bit of attention. So let me try to do some more explaining. This would be my take on the comparable Microsoft architecture:
Let the flames come in...
« Volker likes Expeditor and Notes 8 | Main| vowe is a good mother! »
Disclaimer
This site is in no way affiliated, endorsed, sanctioned, supported, nor enlightened by Lotus Software nor IBM Corporation. I may be an employee, but the opinions, theories, facts, etc. presented here are my own and are in now way given in any official capacity. In short, these are my words and this is my site, not IBM's - and don't even begin to think otherwise. (Disclaimer shamelessly plugged from Rocky Oliver)
© 2003 - 2009 Stephan H. Wissel - all rights reserved as listed here:

Unless otherwise labeled by its originating author, the content found on this site is made available under the terms of an Attribution/NonCommercial/ShareAlike Creative Commons License, with the exception that no rights are granted -- since they are not mine to grant -- in any logo, graphic design, trademarks or trade names of any type.
Comments
I thought that the Microsoft platform required a solid-gold platform with the finest silk draped over it...
And that's just the minimum spec. The recommended spec is a platform of platinum, and the Best Practice requires solid emerald.
Unless, of course, that is emerald in the background. In which case, you forgot your silk...
Posted by Philip Storry At 19:29:30 On 11/17/2006 | - Website - |
Posted by Kevin Pettitt At 01:00:01 On 11/17/2006 | - Website - |
Deciding to use cards or paper money.
Either way the slightest wind of change brings the whole house down.
Rocks don't have that problem.
Posted by Stephen Hood At 11:30:29 On 11/18/2006 | - Website - |