Domino Upgrade

VersionSupport end
5.0
6.0
6.5
7.0
Upgrade to 8.5x now!
(see the full Lotus lifcyle) To make your upgrade a success use the Upgrade Cheat Sheet. Contemplating to replace Notes? You have to read this!

Search

Reference

1. Learn XPages online
2. Communicate with IBMers and Lotus Experts using Sametime

About Me

I am the "IBM Collaboration & Productivity Advisor" for IBM Asia Pacific. I'm based in Singapore.
Reach out to me via:
Follow notessensei on Twitter
(posts)
Skype
Sametime
IBM
Facebook
LinkedIn
XING
Amazon Store
Amazon Kindle

Mobile tag

Twitter

Languages

Other languages on request.

Visitors

Useful Tools

Get Firefox
Use OpenDNS
The support for Windows XP is coming to an end and has . Time to consider an alternative to move on. sounds like a lot of time, but, like an object in a mirror, it is closer than you think.

« How to generate an installable list of Firefox plug-ins/addons? | Main| Domino Designer Import and Export »

Preparing for an IBM compliance audit of your Notes licences

IBM is a business enterprise and sells software licences for a living (For charity you need to ask a certain gentleman from Redmond). Sometimes there are disputes between IBM's customers and IBM how many licences are in use in a certain company. In the spirit of IBM's 3rd core value - Trust and personal responsibility in all relationships - IBM typically tries to sort this out in collaboration with the customer, but from time to time that escalates into a formal compliance check. It has been reported not to be a necessary pleasant experience since for legal reasons outside audit organisations are used who might not have been tuned into IBM's approach to relationships.
In Lotus land a potential sticky point is the question how many Notes Messaging CALs and how many Notes Enterprise CALs (formerly known as Notes Messaging Licence and Notes Collaboration Licence) are in use. The difference between the two licences in a nutshell: Messaging allows eMail, Discussion, Blog, Reference and Journal; Enterprise allows any database and the use of Domino Designer (Read the full details).
An audit will not accept statements like "yeah, the licences are stated as Enterprise for all, but only X percent actually use databases"
What you can/should do in preparation: add all users you think are messaging only users to a group (or a set of nested groups) and add this group to the ACLs of all databases that are not based on the IBM templates above with -No Access- level. This way you rapidly can figure out if there is any user requiring access to those applications (usually accompanied with a scream about IT messing things up).

Also be clear: IBM doesn't require an online activation, disables software when you alter the hardware or a patch failes or sneaks in controlware to check on your licence status.

And of course the way to smart collaboration is not to downsize your licenses, but to upsize your collaboration using some of the excellent free and commercial applications for Domino (Bonus track for customers in Thailand and Hong Kong: Check out Comware).

Disclaimer: This is not any legal advise or something you can cite in an argument, this are just my thoughts

Comments

Gravatar Image1 - Will that ACL trick work? I thought ACL access was cumulative - so in this example, if a user is in 2 groups, one with Author access and one with No Access, they will end up with Author access.

Gravatar Image2 - @Matt: When you are listed in 2 groups you get the access level with the higher priority. -No Access- has the highest priority, followed by Manager. Roles would be cumulative. Of course there are some caveats: Individual name listings trump group memberships and */Org trumps groups as well.

@Henning: I doubt that a single one would, however I agree, that license tracking and updating needs to be easier.

Gravatar Image3 - I keep asking myself how many companies that had one of those lovely audits would prefer online activation!? It also is not true, at least in Germany, that you only get audits if IBM does not agree with reported licenses (at least if you have a certain amount of seats). Geneerally speaking IBM licensing is (too) complicated. You compare it to Microsoft and say that IBM sucks less. I compare it to Google Apps and say both IBM and Microsoft fail. I personally never had a problem with Microsoft online activation but do miss an easy way to uninstall a license. Audits are a good way for generating short term revenues. Over a longer period I believe that it does more harm than it helps. By the way, if you do not officially license IBM software at all you will not get one of those lovely audits either.

Post A Comment

Please note: Comments without a valid and working eMail address will be removed. This is my site, so I decide what stays here and what goes.

:-D:-o:-p:-x:-(:-):-\:angry::cool::cry::emb::grin::huh::laugh::rolleyes:;-)

Disclaimer

This site is in no way affiliated, endorsed, sanctioned, supported, nor enlightened by Lotus Software nor IBM Corporation. I may be an employee, but the opinions, theories, facts, etc. presented here are my own and are in now way given in any official capacity. In short, these are my words and this is my site, not IBM's - and don't even begin to think otherwise. (Disclaimer shamelessly plugged from Rocky Oliver)
© 2003 - 2012 Stephan H. Wissel - all rights reserved as listed here: Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise labeled by its originating author, the content found on this site is made available under the terms of an Attribution/NonCommercial/ShareAlike Creative Commons License, with the exception that no rights are granted -- since they are not mine to grant -- in any logo, graphic design, trademarks or trade names of any type.