Domino Upgrade

VersionSupport end
5.0
6.0
6.5
7.0
Upgrade to 8.5x now!
(see the full Lotus lifcyle) To make your upgrade a success use the Upgrade Cheat Sheet. Contemplating to replace Notes? You have to read this!

Search

Reference

1. Learn XPages online
2. Communicate with IBMers and Lotus Experts using Sametime

About Me

I am the "IBM Collaboration & Productivity Advisor" for IBM Asia Pacific. I'm based in Singapore.
Reach out to me via:
Follow notessensei on Twitter
(posts)
Skype
Sametime
IBM
Facebook
LinkedIn
XING
Amazon Store
Amazon Kindle

Mobile tag

Twitter

Languages

Other languages on request.

Visitors

Useful Tools

Get Firefox
Use OpenDNS
The support for Windows XP is coming to an end and has . Time to consider an alternative to move on. sounds like a lot of time, but, like an object in a mirror, it is closer than you think.

« Reader Fields - extreme Edition (update) | Main| NoReader and NoAuthor Fields »

Address Dialog on stereoids

Over the long live of Lotus Notes the address dialog has been a trusted, never changing compagnion:
The Notes address dialog
Over the years it got some facelift like the ability to drag and drop or the ability to sort by Notes hierarchy, language or corporate hierarchy (anybody seen that?) or to look at details in yet another window. It works OK as long as the number of names is small and diverse. However once you enter cultures that are notoriously short of last names and sport large companies it gets tedious to pick the right Mr. Wang or Mr. Lee. In short: the address dialog is overdue for an overhaul. Since simplicity isn't simple careful considerations are needed. How much more complex the dialog could get to stay reasonable and how simple it needs to be. The requirements I came up with can be quite conflicting.
  • I want to be able to filter the search scope based on a series of criteria:
    • by organizational properties (like department name or org type e.g. "sales"
    • by geography
    • by job role
    • by tags
    • by favorites
    • by source: internal/external, groups, individuals, from Facebook
    • by communication history: frequency or date
    • by search in communication
    • by search in profiles
  • access to list by first name, last name or nick name
  • suggestion of addresses from social analytics
  • display of additional information (address card + tags + list memberships) to positively identify the receipient
  • Indication if encryption is available or not
  • Indication if alternate access (e.g. shared communities) is available
I'm sure there are more criteria available. Packing all of them into one dialog might be a challenge. I played around and created a mockup
how it could look like. What do you think?
An alternate approach to address books
As usual YMMV.

Comments

Gravatar Image1 - @Ian: Any chance to share that code?

Gravatar Image2 - All I want is the space after Last Name removed.

This one very odd feature makes using the "Find Names" box extremely frustrating to most users when there are multiple matches on last name.

Gravatar Image3 - One word: Want!

Gravatar Image4 - Your mock ups are good. Can you share on what software you use for this?

Gravatar Image5 - The original Scott Goods Code is from here:

{ Link }

We have adapted the code to extend this to a names look-up in our Personnel & Contacts database (not the NAB) to handle other search functions such as Alias, Job Description, First Name, Last Name and Organisation Structure (a multi-tiered organisation structure in our application).

Regards,

Ian

Gravatar Image6 - Looks great. Now if you could only include (part of) the OU structure.
In your list I cannot see the difference between both Bruce Lee users.

I know I can click on Details, but users won't....

Gravatar Image7 - @Fred: That's the idea of the business card appearing in the dialog. It would show the full address. But of course one could consider having full qualified names here. After all the dialog above is just a mockup. (And yes it is Balsamiq Mockup with a Shutter filter for the dimension)
Emoticon stw

Gravatar Image8 - Many times I have only remembered somebody's first name and had to open a new memo to get their surname back, via type-ahead, to select their name from the addressing dialog box. It would save time to add the type-ahead to the addressing dialog box directly.

To work around this we have created a mobile directory catalogue which is sort firstname, lastname and users can change to this directory is they know how to.

Gravatar Image9 - Just a comment about displaying information that a person might consider confidential. In some countries and cultures it is unlawfull or unacceptible to display certain confidential information about a person in a public directory system.

Examples include a persons home address, mobile phone number, home phone number. This is due to the obvious threat of "stalkers" in the workplace. Also in some cultures women cannot disclose private contact information to unrelated males without the permission of their family. Even a persons date of birth can be considered sensitive information.

The Domino Directory already contains fields for some of this sensitive information, but assess to it should be tightly controlled.

When considering the expansion of personal information displayed from the NAB, we need to consider these issues of privacy and cultural differences as well.

Additionally, the search by names could be improved by a soundex search, particularly if you are in a part of the world that includes common names that have a significant range of spelling variants for the same name.

Gravatar Image10 - @Veer: I think is balsamiq mockups: { Link }

Gravatar Image11 - We have been using some code developed by Scott Good that provides similar NAB search features through a Web browser interface. We have extended it to include searches by First name, Second name, Alias, Job Title, Organisation Structure etc. The code scales really well and can handle hundreds of thousands of names.

Gravatar Image12 - I think this is very Emoticon . Even within small-ish companies and a great diversity of last names this would be a huge step forward! Esp. I like the one detail with the configurable button labels and target fields

Post A Comment

Please note: Comments without a valid and working eMail address will be removed. This is my site, so I decide what stays here and what goes.

:-D:-o:-p:-x:-(:-):-\:angry::cool::cry::emb::grin::huh::laugh::rolleyes:;-)

Disclaimer

This site is in no way affiliated, endorsed, sanctioned, supported, nor enlightened by Lotus Software nor IBM Corporation. I may be an employee, but the opinions, theories, facts, etc. presented here are my own and are in now way given in any official capacity. In short, these are my words and this is my site, not IBM's - and don't even begin to think otherwise. (Disclaimer shamelessly plugged from Rocky Oliver)
© 2003 - 2012 Stephan H. Wissel - all rights reserved as listed here: Creative Commons License
Unless otherwise labeled by its originating author, the content found on this site is made available under the terms of an Attribution/NonCommercial/ShareAlike Creative Commons License, with the exception that no rights are granted -- since they are not mine to grant -- in any logo, graphic design, trademarks or trade names of any type.