« Internet filtering in Singapore |
Main|
When Firefox and Notes become one »
I'm a big fan of the Inside Security Rescue
CD. The CD squeezes a Linux
(Debian based) with a working GUI, diagnostics and repair tools (anti virus,
partition and hard disk check) on 50 MB of space. It even contains support
to write CDs or DVDs. Why is 50 MB to magic? 50 MB is the storage capacity
of a name card size CD-ROM. I always carry one (or a few) with me. The
NTFS support is read only but seems to be more tolerant than Microsoft's
own NTFS implementation. A number of times where 2000 or XP refused to
recognize a NTFS partition anymore the Rescue CD could still read most
of it.
The CDs are very popular. Whenever I
show what you can do with it to clients or colleagues, I own one less (glad
to be of service).
So I ran out of my mini CD and went
to restock. This time I got Melody
NameCard CD-R. The CD writer refused to write the image. I use Roxio, that
doesn't tell how much short of storage you are (only that). Only the windows
CD writer (which can't write ISO images) told me: 48 MB to write 47 MB
free. So I had a second look: On the package: 50 MB/5min, actual
space inside: 47 MB. Am I out of luck or short changed by the manufacturer?
Or is 6% less space (on all 10 of the package) within tolerance?
AAAARG.
Update: I got a nice reply
from the manufacturer. They apologized for my inconvenience and explained:
The guaranteed storage is 5 minutes of music. One minute is about 9.5 MB,
so 5x9.5 = 47.5 MB. Production tolerance can lead to CDs with more capacity.
The 50MB are the same marketing blah as your 200GB harddisk. However there
is a 6 minute CD available, also labelled 50 MB which has enough storage.
Disclaimer
This site is in no way affiliated, endorsed, sanctioned, supported, nor enlightened by Lotus Software nor IBM Corporation. I may be an employee, but the opinions, theories, facts, etc. presented here are my own and are in now way given in any official capacity. In short, these are my words and this is my site, not IBM's - and don't even begin to think otherwise. (Disclaimer shamelessly plugged from Rocky Oliver)
© 2003 - 2012 Stephan H. Wissel - all rights reserved as listed here:

Unless otherwise labeled by its originating author, the content found on this site is made available under the terms of an Attribution/NonCommercial/ShareAlike Creative Commons License, with the exception that no rights are granted -- since they are not mine to grant -- in any logo, graphic design, trademarks or trade names of any type.
Comments
which is why 4.7GB DVDs are in reality 4.38GB. The same despicable mathematical rule used by hard disk vendors.
The only saving grace are the regular CDs, where 703MB _really_ is 703MB byte for byte. This was the collapsing point for me when I "upgraded" from CD-writing to DVD-writing. The very _same_ manufacturers of the CDs use _different_ formulas for the media.
If they can _properly_ do so for CDs, _why_ can't they for DVDs? Again, despicable.
Posted by icelava At 00:58:49 On 09/15/2005 | - Website - |